Identification audit
Patriarchal and Egyptian Identifications
The project retains several historically suggestive identifications, but they are not equally strong. This dossier separates name resemblance, compatible setting, direct attestation, and project preference.
Method
Four rules for proposed identifications
Claim-by-claim audit
Supporting evidence, objections, and verdicts
The project may adopt a reconstruction for narrative coherence while still labeling it speculative or minority.
Chronological consequence
None of these identifications should function as a fixed point by itself. The Terru–Terah and Amraphel–Hammurabi equations are working hypotheses; the Hyksos reconstruction is a contextual setting; the later oppression transition is a broad historical bridge. The project’s chronology must remain able to survive if any one of them is rejected.
Research base